child desire or fear The Possibility in the
event? Does a child await anxiously the happening of a
given event in order to secure a perspective in life or
position of some sort?
Because the child simply Witnesses the event.
the event, when seen through the eye of the witness,
does not threaten one’s fame of being. It is almost as
if the event, however bad it may be, when seen through
the eye of the witness, becomes a feature of the
experience of sight, and not anywhere near threatening
the security of being itself.
long as one’s frame of being is secured, optimism
endures. And as long as the subject transcends
judgmental or interpretive sight, his secure position as
a witness is preserved.
challenges the witness in man?
man's behavioral tendency to subdue the witness to the
grammar of the scene being witnessed - to enter the
scene of an event as an actor using that which he
know as a witness for the purpose of gaining
importance - becoming witnessed himself. So, what is he
then investing in? More and more behavioral confusion,
since he is counting on the continuous absence of the
Original Eye which sees his role in the scene from the
perspective of his original position and exposes this
role for the lie it represents in relation to the
choice which man takes on the level of Thought results
in a sequential behavioral effect similar to the circles
produced by a pebble when thrown unto the ocean on a
calm day. His behavioral acts in the scene help fulfill
outdated forms and meanings which he had already known
as a witness to the scene. It is like stepping into a
story which one already knows its ending only to enjoy
playing a role in it, slowly loosing touch with the
element that made one like the story to begin with.
acts in the scene gradually expresses the pain of his
departure from his ultimate reality as a witness. Such
pain colors the logic of events and the story,
subjecting sight to the weight of temporal causality,
dispiriting the soul with the activity of linking events
in accord to a system of meaning ruled by “before &
after” “the antecedent and the consequent until reality
grows to resemble history (a sequence of wars and
conflict without any cause or explanation).
at the world as it is now. It is nothing but a story
that revolves around the Spiritual Fall of the Soul
from the Heaven of Adam (The Wholly Witness) through a
form of sight that utilizes the witness's power to
depart away from the witness's truth, just like a moon
utilizing the sunlight in the darkness to appear as
though it is the source of light itself. Everyone
desires to become the Christ of his own story, and that
is why Christ (The Wholly Mind) said: "He who knows the
difference between me and the father could not be
subjected to the Religious Illnesses and the Contagious
Diseases (Faulty Spiritual Directions) from which
partake the Eternal Death..." (The Ancient Wisdom).
Consider the following:
Existence through intuition, without the element of
interpretation, is absolute and immaculate, with both a
Mental & an External evidence which is
unequaled, unrivaled unexampled.
existence, when taken up by thought and subjected to
definition or interpretation, produces through Thought
an indefinite image of a contrary called: nought
non-existence. This mysterious image at its essence is
responsible for all the negativity that thought builds
up around the Destiny of a Soul in Time.
anything this should prove that only through thought,
there rises some form of existence to non-existence =
The Scary Image of the Unknown.
the depths of such form of vision lies the
Unforgivable Sin and the only sin to which divine
punishment is applicable, because the weight of such
punishment cannot be sensed save through such view of
reality which shakes the very foundation of man’s being
and threatens to lasts as long as thought does. And
there is no punishment greater than being ignorant of
such sin, which is equal to: Constant lack of belief in
the absolute polarity between existence and
non-existence or (in other words) the banishing nature
of existence to non-existence.
seeks the meaning of existence through anything foreign
to his own Adamic Presence right here right now, stays
up throughout the nights following events with his naked
eyes, not knowing that the pain of waiting is all what
awaits him. And such pain, unlike happiness, when
exposed more and more to the weight that time imposes
upon sight, it is bound to increase.
other hand, existence through the eye of a witness is
indisputable, and the happiness is from what the witness
derives from the meanings of existence through the
comfort he derives from knowing that he is only
witnessing the scene and not from the thoughts that
interpret the importance of his role as an actor in it.
“Existence is not Mental neither External, otherwise
there would’ve been an existence to existence. Thus,
there was the saying that the source of this existence
is like no other thing out there…” (The Fifth Special
Interpretation is thus a Psychological Work (Psyche: the
negative side of soul) that opposes spiritual oneness,
which is the state of the soul not being divided with
the sequence of events.
Because the sequence of an event which takes place on
the level of thought is consequent or latent to the
actual event and its logic operates on a level of
causality that is forever dependant on the previous and
the next, just like the Negative of a Photographic Film.
Existence is the spirit behind every motion. It is
authentically ancient, not by virtue of being the most
first-time cause traceable, it is ancient in the sense
that it precedes the event in form or essence, as do the
“number” precedes “two” or the concept “fruit” precedes
the concept “apple”.
true existence is a more like a complete picture that
does not require time and matter to be fulfilled or to
be proven. Otherwise, its ancientness would not have
been authentic, because it would’ve always been subject
to be new in relation to something that precedes it.
As for the Ancientness that pertains to the time-element
or the order of events, it is not a characteristic of
reality, but rather, it is the characteristic of the way
sight interprets reality.
For, thought that revolves around
sight is forever under the mercy of the way sight is
directed and thus, it is forever “temporal” in relation
to the eternal nature of sight.